Mergers, Foreign Competition, and Jobs: Evidence from the U.S. Appliance Industry

Abstract

Policy choices often entail trade-offs between workers and consumers. I assess how foreign competition changes the consumer welfare and domestic employment effects of a merger. I construct a model accounting for demand responses, endogenous product portfolios, and employment. I apply this model to Whirlpool’s acquisition of Maytag in the household appliance industry. I compare the observed acquisition to a counterfactual one by a foreign buyer. While Whirlpool’s acquisition decreased consumer welfare by $230 million annually, it preserved 900 domestic jobs. Therefore, these jobs need to be worth above $260,000 annually for the domestic employment effects to offset the consumer harm.

Click the Slides button above to demo Academic’s Markdown slides feature.

Supplementary notes can be added here, including code and math.

Related